My research project is going pretty good rightnow a little behind but am talking wiht my organization and firguring out a problem they are facing. but that is a challenge to trying to work together with them and figuing out what to talk about.
and for critical thinking gone wrong I was looking at the Coleman and Franklen issue and I read a statement colemans campaign they said " some votes already tallied during the recount must be illegal" I just think that this statement could be changed a little because they dont have the evidence yet to prove it. Im not saying they are wrong just that they should have maybe worded it a little diferenly or say that once they absolutely know it is true.
